What ensures that users do not have conflicting access rights in Saviynt?

The concept of Segregation of Duties (SoD) is crucial in ensuring that users do not have conflicting access rights within systems like Saviynt. By implementing SoD, organizations can divide critical tasks and privileges among different users to reduce the risk of fraud and errors. This principle helps establish clear boundaries regarding what tasks a single user is authorized to perform, which mitigates the risk of a user gaining too much power or access that could lead to conflicts of interest.

For example, in a financial environment, SoD would prevent a single user from having both the authority to authorize a payment and the ability to edit payment details. This separation protects against potential misuse or errors that can occur when one individual has access to multiple conflicting roles.

Other choices like access restrictions, role-based access control, and user training sessions play supportive roles in access management and security but do not specifically focus on preventing conflicting access rights in the way that SoD does. Access restrictions might limit what a user can do, but they do not inherently address the aspect of conflict between different access rights. Role-based access control establishes user permissions based on assigned roles, yet without SoD, it would not actively manage potential conflicts. User training is important but does not prevent conflicting access rights on