Which process in Saviynt helps to identify and resolve potential conflicts before they occur?

The process in Saviynt that helps to identify and resolve potential conflicts before they occur is known as Preventive Analysis. This process is crucial in the context of identity governance and administration, as it allows organizations to proactively identify areas where conflicts might arise, particularly in relation to Segregation of Duties (SoD) violations.

Preventive Analysis involves assessing user roles, permissions, and access patterns against predefined policies and rules. By doing this, organizations can foresee potential conflicts—such as situations where a user might have access to both sides of a critical transaction—before they have a chance to impact operations or compliance. The goal is to determine and address any risky situations early in the process, thereby reducing the likelihood of security breaches or compliance issues.

Other options like Mitigation Plan, SOD Verification, and Compliance Review are important processes as well but they often react to identified issues rather than preventing them proactively. Mitigation Plans are implemented after potential conflicts have been identified, whereas SOD Verification focuses on validating user permissions against SoD policies. Compliance Review typically assesses adherence to regulations and policies after the fact, rather than aiming to prevent conflicts in advance. Thus, Preventive Analysis stands out as the most forward-looking approach in this scenario.